<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paying to pitch revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/</link>
	<description>Spurring innovation and entrepreneurship.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/#comment-350098</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/?p=3192#comment-350098</guid>
		<description>Add The North Dallas Investment Group to your list. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add The North Dallas Investment Group to your list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos T</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/#comment-349992</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/?p=3192#comment-349992</guid>
		<description>Paying an angel group to pitch:  Bad 
Paying a group (Keiretsu) to pitch: Bad business model but not completely out of the question.  Keiretsu gathers many angels together.  The entrepreneur does not have to travel pitching thus saves money traveling.   
 
But, in reality, Keiretsu should be paid by the investor NOT the entrepreneur,  for bringing the two together.  The yield spread premium should be transparent of course.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paying an angel group to pitch:  Bad<br />
Paying a group (Keiretsu) to pitch: Bad business model but not completely out of the question.  Keiretsu gathers many angels together.  The entrepreneur does not have to travel pitching thus saves money traveling.   </p>
<p>But, in reality, Keiretsu should be paid by the investor NOT the entrepreneur,  for bringing the two together.  The yield spread premium should be transparent of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KublaiKhan</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/#comment-349989</link>
		<dc:creator>KublaiKhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/?p=3192#comment-349989</guid>
		<description>True.  I guess I just rank that bad up there with fast food companies and internet marketers.  People know it is crud, but they think, &#34;Hey quick and easy.&#34;  Oh well. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.  I guess I just rank that bad up there with fast food companies and internet marketers.  People know it is crud, but they think, &quot;Hey quick and easy.&quot;  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Muse</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/#comment-349988</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Muse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/?p=3192#comment-349988</guid>
		<description>I would argue that you are right and wrong.  I agree that it is the startups&#039; problem, but I would argue that &#34;prey[ing] on the uninformed and ill prepared&#34; is inherently bad.  Thanks for the comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that you are right and wrong.  I agree that it is the startups&#039; problem, but I would argue that &quot;prey[ing] on the uninformed and ill prepared&quot; is inherently bad.  Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KublaiKhan</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2009/10/20/paying-to-pitch-revisited/#comment-349986</link>
		<dc:creator>KublaiKhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/?p=3192#comment-349986</guid>
		<description>While I agree that startups should not pay to play.  The angel groups being portrayed as &#34;bad&#34; really annoys me.  These angel groups prey on the uninformed and ill prepared.  This is the startups&#039; problems. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree that startups should not pay to play.  The angel groups being portrayed as &quot;bad&quot; really annoys me.  These angel groups prey on the uninformed and ill prepared.  This is the startups&#039; problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
