<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Startups and Kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/10/13/startups-and-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/10/13/startups-and-kids/</link>
	<description>Spurring innovation and entrepreneurship.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob La Gesse</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/10/13/startups-and-kids/#comment-249365</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob La Gesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/10/13/startups-and-kids/#comment-249365</guid>
		<description>My involvement with Web 1.0 was on the periphery - we were setting up some of the infrastructure that enabled web 2.0.

We helped invent WiFi - and while it isn't talked about much as a Web 2.0 product I certainly think has been a driving factor.

But yes, we had a lot of fun, some cool coffee makers, wonderful offices and paid everyone handsomely.

But these are the good old days - now you don't need a million dollars worth of equipment to build something that has a huge return.

The risk to starting a business is so much lower now - the cost of entry can be as low as almost zero - and almost any idea can be developed, and launched, in some fashion or another.

In many ways we are now living in a time that allows us to do many of the things we planned on doing almost a decade ago.  But now the technology exists, and it's cheap - and there are a lot of people that know how to implement it.  And imagination is the only real barrier to entry.

I prefer now.

Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My involvement with Web 1.0 was on the periphery - we were setting up some of the infrastructure that enabled web 2.0.</p>
<p>We helped invent WiFi - and while it isn&#8217;t talked about much as a Web 2.0 product I certainly think has been a driving factor.</p>
<p>But yes, we had a lot of fun, some cool coffee makers, wonderful offices and paid everyone handsomely.</p>
<p>But these are the good old days - now you don&#8217;t need a million dollars worth of equipment to build something that has a huge return.</p>
<p>The risk to starting a business is so much lower now - the cost of entry can be as low as almost zero - and almost any idea can be developed, and launched, in some fashion or another.</p>
<p>In many ways we are now living in a time that allows us to do many of the things we planned on doing almost a decade ago.  But now the technology exists, and it&#8217;s cheap - and there are a lot of people that know how to implement it.  And imagination is the only real barrier to entry.</p>
<p>I prefer now.</p>
<p>Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startups and Kids</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/10/13/startups-and-kids/#comment-249333</link>
		<dc:creator>Startups and Kids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 03:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/10/13/startups-and-kids/#comment-249333</guid>
		<description>[...] askripko wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWeb1.0: The original conception of the web (in this context, labelled Web 1.0) comprised static HTML pages that were updated rarely, if at all. The success of the dot-com era depended on a more dynamic web (sometimes labeled Web 1.5) &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] askripko wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptWeb1.0: The original conception of the web (in this context, labelled Web 1.0) comprised static HTML pages that were updated rarely, if at all. The success of the dot-com era depended on a more dynamic web (sometimes labeled Web 1.5) &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
