<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reagan&#8217;s 80% Rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/07/16/reagans-80-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/07/16/reagans-80-rule/</link>
	<description>Spurring innovation and entrepreneurship.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 21:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sports News and Resources</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/07/16/reagans-80-rule/#comment-278418</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports News and Resources</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/07/16/reagans-80-rule/#comment-278418</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sports News and Resources&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry, it just sounds like a crazy idea for me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sports News and Resources</strong></p>
<p>Sorry, it just sounds like a crazy idea for me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When does the argument become unhealthy? &#171; wicksite</title>
		<link>http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/07/16/reagans-80-rule/#comment-196480</link>
		<dc:creator>When does the argument become unhealthy? &#171; wicksite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.texasstartupblog.com/2007/07/16/reagans-80-rule/#comment-196480</guid>
		<description>[...] But how do you balance productive disagreement such that it doesn&#8217;t slide toward groupthink (where no one dissents, ever) or the quagmire of constant debate (where every little issue is argued)? I like what Alexander Muse has to say about it in his blog (via Ronald Reagan): …this 80% rule is very true in running a business as well. You can’t expect your employees to agree with 100% of your decisions. But your employees also realize that they will never agree with 100% of their company’s decisions. At about the 80% rule, with enough transparency around decision-making to make the missing 20% at least seem rational, you have a winning formula. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But how do you balance productive disagreement such that it doesn&#8217;t slide toward groupthink (where no one dissents, ever) or the quagmire of constant debate (where every little issue is argued)? I like what Alexander Muse has to say about it in his blog (via Ronald Reagan): …this 80% rule is very true in running a business as well. You can’t expect your employees to agree with 100% of your decisions. But your employees also realize that they will never agree with 100% of their company’s decisions. At about the 80% rule, with enough transparency around decision-making to make the missing 20% at least seem rational, you have a winning formula. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
